Why might a coerced confession be suppressed in court?

A coerced confession may be suppressed in court primarily to preserve the individual's freedom of will, which is a foundational principle in the justice system. The legal system is designed to uphold the rights and dignity of individuals, ensuring that any confession or admission made by a suspect is given voluntarily and with full understanding of the implications. Coercion undermines this principle, as it forces individuals to relinquish their free will, often leading to statements made under duress that may not reflect the truth.

Confessions obtained through coercion can result in unreliable evidence and wrongful convictions, going against the integrity of the justice system. To maintain the integrity of legal processes, courts suppress such confessions to protect the rights of the accused and promote fair legal practices. By ensuring that confessions are obtained lawfully and ethically, the courts reinforce the importance of voluntary participation in legal proceedings and protect against abusive practices.

Other choices do not address the fundamental rights of individuals or the underlying purpose of the legal system in maintaining justice and equity. For instance, the notion that a coerced confession might be true is irrelevant to the concerns about coercion itself. Similarly, ideas about how such a confession might strengthen a case overlook the potential for wrongful conviction that stems from irretrievable violations of personal