Which of the following is NOT a reason to take a child into custody?

Taking a child into custody is typically justified under specific legal frameworks and circumstances that prioritize the child's safety and well-being, the enforcement of laws, or adherence to judicial directives. The notion of "to protect the child's reputation," however, does not constitute a valid legal or ethical reason to take a child into custody.

Child custody actions are meant to address immediate risks or legal obligations, such as compliance with a court order, safeguarding a child who is in an unsafe situation, or taking action when there is probable cause to believe the child has run away. Ensuring a child's reputation is a subjective consideration and does not align with the established standards that guide law enforcement and child welfare interventions.

Overall, the focus of child custody decisions is primarily on safety, legality, and following appropriate procedures rather than on protecting reputation, which may not warrant the same level of intervention.